I think it's safe to say that when Brit soldiers came in in 1969 large sections of the nationalist community supported them. Did the pIRA set about consciously destroying this relationship by targeting people who helped the security forces?
I've always believed that it was the Brits -- especially the paras -- who started alienating *both* communities with their heavy-handed ways, but recently I've heard a different point of view, that the IRA began to target the soldiers in order to create a conflict from a standing start. This theory seems to chimes with the tactics of Maoist 'foci' -- escalate the people's war to strengthen the vanguard, etc.
Anyone more clued up than me want to comment?
Interesting speculation lacking any evidence.
What about the clear evidence of loyalist collusion with the forces of the British State and the fact that the RUC fired rubber bullets at civil rights marches without provocation. (I am sure you don't have any rattling in your head.) Bloody Sunday, Pat Finucane etc etc. Such are the divisions the British State likes to sow amongst the workers, who have more in common etc...